Kant 's Ethical Theory Of Abortion Essay - 1266 Words.
Citations of this work BETA. On a Kantian Argument Against Abortion. Bryan Wilson - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (1):119 - 130. Immanuel Kant, His Philosophy and Medicine. Urban Wiesing - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):221-236. Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Humanity. Lina Papadaki - 2012 - Humana Mente 5 (22).
The best way for someone to refer to abortion on an ethical basis would probably be through the description and evaluation of the subject based on two of the most known theoretical approaches: those of Kant’s and of Utilitarianism (Act and Rule).
David Boonin has written the most thorough and detailed case for the moral permissibility of abortion yet published. Critically examining a wide range of arguments that attempt to prove that every human fetus has a right to life, he shows that each of these arguments fails on its own terms.
The topic of abortion is highly debated among various groups of people all around the world. Abortion is a synthetic way of ending a pregnancy by extraction or removal of an embryo before it can live outside the womb. Because of the moral subsoil of the question, it is fiercely discussed even in the countries where such medical procedure is allowed by the government.
Biblical Arguments Against Abortion I should be forthright and tell you that I do not believe the Bible or any other religious text should be the basis for current laws or practices, nor should any system of morality be imposed on a democratic country or population. While the opposition to religion in government during the founding of this.
The formula of universal law (FUL) is a natural starting point for philosophers interested in a Kantian perspective on the morality of abortion. I argue, however, that FUL does not yield much in the way of promising or substantive conclusions regarding the morality of abortion.
This paper examines the issue of abortion from a Kantian perspective. More specifically, it focuses on Kant’s Formula of Humanity of the Categorical Imperative and the prohibition against treating humanity merely as a means. It has been argued by feminists that forcing a woman to continue a pregnancy against her will is treating her as a mere means for sustaining the fetus, a mere “fetal.